Freight carriers (except air couriers), air, scheduled · Florida

Quality Container Terminal Inc

Miami, FL · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Container Terminal Inc runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Freight carriers (except air couriers), air, scheduled workplace, earning a grade C.

Quality Container Terminal Inc: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Freight carriers (except air couriers), air, scheduled BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Container Terminal Inc safety composite

Quality Container Terminal Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Quality Container Terminal Inc held a steady TCR band

Quality Container Terminal Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481112 · Miami, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO Ameriflight, LLC- Sa…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ameriflight, LLC- Salt Lake City (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Quality Container Terminal Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Container Terminal Inc averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Freight carriers (except air couriers), air, scheduled BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Container Terminal Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Quality Container Terminal Inc falls in its industry

45 Freight carriers (except air c establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Quality Container Terminal Inc (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 25 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 26 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Container Terminal Inc
Quality Container Terminal Inc (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 25 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Quality Container Terminal Inc has fewer employees than the Freight carriers (except air couriers), median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481112 · FL · Miami

45 Freight carriers (except air couriers), air, scheduled employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ameriflight, LLC- Salt Lake City 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSA Air, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABX Air CVG (ABX) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR House2Home Deliveries LLC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Immokalee Research Station 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE L&M Warehouse & Packing of North Florida LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Farms Corporation 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE DY4 Ormond Beach Service Center 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE NPPD - Sutherland 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #111 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utilities - Sewerage Systems 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE ECHO Mountain Realty 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.