Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass · New York

Quality Enclosures Inc.

Central Islip, NY · ~122 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Enclosures Inc. runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade D.

Quality Enclosures Inc.: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Enclosures Inc. safety composite

Quality Enclosures Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2018→2023

Quality Enclosures Inc. injury rate improved

Quality Enclosures Inc.'s TCR fell 2.6 from 7.5 in 2018 to 5.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.5 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=5.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Central Islip, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO Paragon Tempered Glass
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Paragon Tempered Glass (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Quality Enclosures Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Enclosures Inc. averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Enclosures Inc. TCR series: 2018=7.5 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=5 · BLS 3.3

Where Quality Enclosures Inc. falls in its industry

441 Glass products (except packagi establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 Glass products (except packagi employers in New York.

Quality Enclosures Inc. (122 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Enclosures Inc.
Quality Enclosures Inc. (122 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Quality Enclosures Inc. has more employees than the Glass products (except packaging contain median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.0 5.0 6 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 6 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 5 0 0
2020 9.8 8.8 10 0 0
2018 7.5 6.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · NY · Central Islip

441 Glass products (except packaging containers) made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 20 employers in Central Islip, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Paragon Tempered Glass 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Global Custom Decorating 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fresno Shower Doors 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Plate Glass Company (Butler) 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Diebold Nixdorf Garden City NY 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eltech Industries, Inc 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lactalis Heritage Dairy 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4371 North Tonawanda Container 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unit 3 414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Long Island, LLC 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ascent Pharmaceuticals 258 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2102 - Central Islip 201 FTE
NAT-TCR Corydon Specialty Care 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lansing Metal Center 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Electro Construction Corp. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ft. Lauderdale 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE San Marcos Test Lab 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transportation 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Motion Systems : Olive Branch 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sayre Pa Plant 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.