Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Michigan

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC

Spring Lake, MI · ~24 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC safety composite

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC held a steady TCR band

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 0.0 TCR.

2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Spring Lake, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/89
  • PHOTO Quality Logistics Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Logistics Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 89 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Michigan.

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC (24 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC
Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC (24 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Quality Life Science Logistics, LLC has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · MI · Spring Lake

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 38 employers in Spring Lake, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Logistics Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300000170856345 - WI-Green Bay-RBC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowell, AR - JB Hunt Corporate A Marketing 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY INC 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bay Coopersville 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE AN3 Logisitcs LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE American House - Westland Hunter 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE 251910-CLAWSON PO 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Herman Miller, Inc, (Meridian) - 171st 792 FTE
CITY-NEAR MillerKnoll, Inc, (Meridian) - 171st 636 FTE
CITY-NEAR Herman Miller (Meridian) Hickory 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR MillerKnoll (Meridian) Hickory 312 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Perfection Machine & Tool Works 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilford Home Center 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reycon Construction Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Florida Branch 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.