Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Michigan

Quality Metalcraft, Inc.

Livonia, MI · ~468 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Metalcraft, Inc. runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Quality Metalcraft, Inc.: 5.9 TCR = 109% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Metalcraft, Inc. safety composite

Quality Metalcraft, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2016→2021

Quality Metalcraft, Inc. injury rate improved

Quality Metalcraft, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.6 from 11.2 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 11.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.2 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Livonia, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.9 · 109% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #103/165
  • PHOTO Walker Spring & Stam…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 165 inj
  • SIZE ~468 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walker Spring & Stamping (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Quality Metalcraft, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Metalcraft, Inc. averages 5.9 TCR (109% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Metalcraft, Inc. TCR series: 2016=11.2 · 2017=8.4 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=4 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=2.6 · BLS 5.4

Where Quality Metalcraft, Inc. falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 165 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Michigan.

Quality Metalcraft, Inc. (468 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Metalcraft, Inc.
Quality Metalcraft, Inc. (468 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Quality Metalcraft, Inc. has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.6 1.9 7 0 0
2020 4.3 3.6 12 1 0
2019 4.0 1.9 11 6 0
2018 4.8 3.5 22 4 0
2017 8.4 5.1 49 10 0
2016 11.2 6.8 64 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · MI · Livonia

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 282 employers in Livonia, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walker Spring & Stamping 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerging Advanced Products, LLC 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR RSDC of Michigan 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TTD - Bennett 5.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dan's Excavating, Inc. 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE LGCMI 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stryker Instruments - 6201 468 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUN COMMUNITIES-CORPORATE OFFICE 468 FTE
CITY-NEAR System Office - Livonia 6,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission Plant 3,122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Livonia Transmission 2,968 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acro Service 2,701 FTE
NAT-TCR Nuss Truck & Equipment- St. Cloud 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR TM Track Machines 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR In-N-Out Burger Warehouse 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemps Oakhurst Dairy - Portland 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southwestern Energy-Corporate Office 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas Beverages 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kasai North America, Inc. - Talladega AL Plant 468 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.R.E. - Massillon, OH 468 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.