Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Quality Perforating Inc

Carbondale, PA · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Perforating Inc runs at 288% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Quality Perforating Inc: 9.5 TCR = 288% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Perforating Inc safety composite

Quality Perforating Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.9

2016→2020

Quality Perforating Inc injury rate improved

Quality Perforating Inc's TCR fell 17.9 from 17.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.9 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=14.9 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Carbondale, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.5 · 288% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/26
  • PHOTO MMP of Merrill Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MMP of Merrill Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Quality Perforating Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Perforating Inc averages 9.5 TCR (288% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Perforating Inc TCR series: 2016=17.9 · 2017=7.7 · 2018=14.9 · 2019=7 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Quality Perforating Inc falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 26 Metal stampings (except automo employers in Pennsylvania.

Quality Perforating Inc (40 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Perforating Inc
Quality Perforating Inc (40 employees, TCR 9.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Quality Perforating Inc has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.0 0.0 1 1 0
2018 14.9 0.0 4 1 0
2017 7.7 2.6 3 0 0
2016 17.9 2.6 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · PA · Carbondale

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 12 employers in Carbondale, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MMP of Merrill Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 700 Schrader 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WGJF Mfg. Corp 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Scout 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CNB Mushroom, LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASA Mushroom LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Conard-Pyle Co. 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Greenhouses, LLC -PA 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gentex Corporation 575 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carbondale Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR 171 140 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hendrick Manufacturing Company 135 FTE
NAT-TCR Blisterpak Inc 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Waste Resources, Inc 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Orange Park Medical Center 9.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HG517 9.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE J-M Northwest, Inc. dba Dick's Towing & Transport 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elmwood Assisted Living 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fords Produce Company Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0000000127 Quickchek Food Stores 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.