Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing · Utah

Quality Steel Corp.

West Jordan, UT · ~59 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Steel Corp. runs at 207% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Quality Steel Corp.: 6.8 TCR = 207% of Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Steel Corp. safety composite

Quality Steel Corp. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Quality Steel Corp.: 5.5 → 13.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 13.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2022

Quality Steel Corp.'s TCR rose 7.5 from 5.5 in 2017 to 13.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332420 · West Jordan, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.8 · 207% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Superior Tank Compan…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Superior Tank Company, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Quality Steel Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Steel Corp. averages 6.8 TCR (207% of the Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Steel Corp. TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=5.8 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=13 · BLS 3.3

Where Quality Steel Corp. falls in its industry

355 Accumulators, industrial press establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Accumulators, industrial press employers in Utah.

Quality Steel Corp. (59 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Steel Corp.
Quality Steel Corp. (59 employees, TCR 6.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Quality Steel Corp. has fewer employees than the Accumulators, industrial pressure vessel median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 13.0 8.3 11 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 5.8 4.4 4 0 0
2019 9.7 6.5 6 0 0
2018 5.4 0.0 3 0 0
2017 5.5 1.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332420 · UT · West Jordan

355 Accumulators, industrial pressure vessels, heavy gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 136 employers in West Jordan, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Superior Tank Company, Inc. 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamilton Tanks LLC 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arc Controls Inc. 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Watco Floresville Plant 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 105355 - TIC Blue Sky Carrying Job 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landmark Excavating Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Condie Construction Company 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Solar LLC dba eEquals 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - SLC2 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR JP Display Warehouse 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Intermountain 477 FTE
CITY-NEAR SnugZ USA, LLC 476 FTE
NAT-TCR Co-Mo Electric Cooperative, Inc. Lake Dist. 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Mary Mercy Hospital 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Piper Fire Protection Inc Sarasota 6.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0035-0035-01431 6.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE PSSI - 0034 West Liberty Foods LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG674 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sauk Prairie Healthcare - Medical Office Building 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Independent Eyewear Manufacturing 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.