Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Ohio

Quality Welding, Inc.

Bellevue, OH · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Welding, Inc. runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Quality Welding, Inc.: 1.7 TCR = 82% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Welding, Inc. safety composite

Quality Welding, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2016→2024

Quality Welding, Inc. injury rate improved

Quality Welding, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Bellevue, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #41/121
  • PHOTO Arbon Equipment - Se…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arbon Equipment - Seattle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Quality Welding, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Welding, Inc. averages 1.7 TCR (82% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Welding, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.9 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Quality Welding, Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #41 safest of 121 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Ohio.

Quality Welding, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Welding, Inc.
Quality Welding, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Quality Welding, Inc. has fewer employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · OH · Bellevue

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 27 employers in Bellevue, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arbon Equipment - Seattle 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northline Industrial, Inc 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Loftin Equipment Company Headquarters 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder Transportation Services, Pompano Beach 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hog and Maitenance 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE YNOT Farm 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE OA Facility Maintenance Shop 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMT INDUSTRIES 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Bellevue Hospital 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC - Bellevue 381 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tower Automotive 350 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilbert Plastic Services- Bellevue, OH 253 FTE
NAT-TCR AllClear Aerospace & Defense - Camarillo, CA. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Austin (Operations & HOA) 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR EpiWorks 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Aptus Group USA LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Milford Redi Mix Co. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trenton Plastics, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan ATF Holdings LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Glass Company, LLC 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.