Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities · New York

Queens Village - Queens

Queens Village, NY · ~32 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Queens Village - Queens runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Queens Village - Queens: 5.7 TCR = 150% of Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Queens Village - Queens safety composite

Queens Village - Queens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Queens Village - Queens held a steady TCR band

Queens Village - Queens's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 21.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=21.4 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Queens Village, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 150% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #90/142
  • PHOTO Community Programs o…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Community Programs of WJCS, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Queens Village - Queens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Queens Village - Queens averages 5.7 TCR (150% of the Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Queens Village - Queens TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=21.4 · 2022=8.7 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Queens Village - Queens falls in its industry

1,165 Residential Mental Health and establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 142 Residential Mental Health and employers in New York.

Queens Village - Queens (32 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Queens Village - Queens
Queens Village - Queens (32 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Queens Village - Queens has fewer employees than the Residential Mental Health and Substance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2022 8.7 4.3 2 0 0
2021 21.4 16.0 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · NY · Queens Village

1,165 Residential Mental Health and Substance Abuse Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 24 employers in Queens Village, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Community Programs of WJCS, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benson OP 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mains'l California, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Integrated Services Agency Modesto 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Schofield Farms LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms - Bliss 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1482 West Genesee Road, Baldwinsville NY 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE 166 Gary Dr., Brockport, NY 14420 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR LONG ISLAND CONCRETE INC 601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Innovative Resources for Independence 555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Queens Tap 507 FTE
CITY-NEAR Queens Adult Home 507 FTE
NAT-TCR Maricopa County - Equipment Services (740) 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dal-Tile 188 Salt Lake City 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Neenah 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarke Power Services-126 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE S03199 - Feather River Disposal, Inc 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altec NUECO 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE SB Structures, LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dodge City 3703 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.