Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing · California

Quick Quack Car Wash COE

Roseville, CA · ~56 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quick Quack Car Wash COE runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Quick Quack Car Wash COE: 1.1 TCR = 33% of Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quick Quack Car Wash COE safety composite

Quick Quack Car Wash COE scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Quick Quack Car Wash COE: 0.0 → 2.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Quick Quack Car Wash COE's TCR rose 2.2 from 0.0 in 2023 to 2.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331110 · Roseville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Nucor Steel Jackson
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nucor Steel Jackson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Quick Quack Car Wash COE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quick Quack Car Wash COE averages 1.1 TCR (33% of the Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quick Quack Car Wash COE TCR series: 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Quick Quack Car Wash COE falls in its industry

416 Steel mill products (e.g., bar establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Steel mill products (e.g., bar employers in California.

Quick Quack Car Wash COE (56 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Quick Quack Car Wash COE
Quick Quack Car Wash COE (56 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Quick Quack Car Wash COE has fewer employees than the Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, r median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331110 · CA · Roseville

416 Steel mill products (e.g., bar, plate, rod, sheet, structural shapes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nucor Steel Jackson 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Oconomowoc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Steel Gallatin 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PITTSBURGH PIPE AT LITCHFIELD 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Southeast Ops General 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Millipore Sigma 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer Steel, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TSI Incorporated 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Melrose Park Logistics 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Umcl Management LLC 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Manor of Ransomville 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evansville Zone 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.