Tobacco farming, field and seed production · North Carolina

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc.

Snow Hill, NC · ~26 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tobacco farming, field and seed production workplace, earning a grade C.

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Tobacco farming, field and seed production BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. safety composite

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. held a steady TCR band

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111910 · Snow Hill, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/15
  • PHOTO Holland Farms, Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Holland Farms, Inc (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Tobacco farming, field and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. falls in its industry

22 Tobacco farming, field and see establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 15 Tobacco farming, field and see employers in North Carolina.

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 25 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 10 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Andrew Tyson FarmsStrickland Farms PayrollRock Ridge Farms PartnershipYarbrough Farms LLCFarmB & S Farming, Inc.Thomas Family Farms, Inc.FARMHolland Farms, IncR. A. Wood Farms, Inc.
R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 25 employees and a TCR of 1.6

R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. has more employees than the Tobacco farming, field and seed producti median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111910 · NC · Snow Hill

22 Tobacco farming, field and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 10 employers in Snow Hill, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Holland Farms, Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR B & S Farming, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR FARM 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SHARP FARM INC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4535-1252 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Store 0463 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cost Plus World Market SOUTHPOINTE 6207 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Felker Day Newton 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greendale Forest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greendale Forest Nursing and Rehab Center 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR River Neuse Group, LLC d/b/a Greendale Forest Nursing and Rehab Center 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greendale Forest Nursing & Rehab 100 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 432 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 426 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 240 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 231 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Omni Visions Lawrenceburg 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flowline Contractors, Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dirt Hugger 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Ruscoe Company- Miller 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.