Bridge construction · New York

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc.

Binghamton, NY · ~50 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. runs at 298% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bridge construction workplace, earning a grade F.

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc.: 8.3 TCR = 298% of Bridge construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. safety composite

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−17.0

2016→2024

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 17.0 from 19.2 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 19.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=19.2 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=13.6 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Binghamton, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 298% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #156/165
  • PHOTO J.V. Lucas
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J.V. Lucas (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. averages 8.3 TCR (298% of the Bridge construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2016=19.2 · 2017=15.6 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=13.6 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.8

Where R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Bridge construction establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #156 safest of 165 Bridge construction employers in New York.

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc.
R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

R. DeVincentis Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Bridge construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2022 6.2 2.1 3 0 0
2021 7.9 2.0 4 0 0
2020 13.6 6.8 5 1 0
2019 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2018 5.9 2.9 2 0 0
2017 15.6 5.2 5 1 0
2016 19.2 10.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NY · Binghamton

4,078 Bridge construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 139 employers in Binghamton, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR J.V. Lucas 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fancy Gap AHQ 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Office 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comanche Construction of GA LLC 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction Group 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vacri Construction Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg Contracting Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Development, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Health Services Hospitals, Inc. 2,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-NYBIN1 1,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Tier Independence Center 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR KIRKWOOD PLANT 544 FTE
NAT-TCR River Terrace Health Campus 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fisher Cast Steel Products, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Matthews Roofing Company, Inc. 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Spencer Municipal Utilities 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAS-ESS 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grind All Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silbond Corporation 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.