Concrete finishing · California

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc.

Fresno, CA · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Concrete finishing workplace, earning a grade F.

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc.: 7.5 TCR = 267% of Concrete finishing BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. safety composite

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2017→2024

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. injury rate improved

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc.'s TCR fell 11.1 from 16.8 in 2017 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.8 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 267% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #127/166
  • PHOTO Gioia Concrete Const…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gioia Concrete Construction Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. averages 7.5 TCR (267% of the Concrete finishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. TCR series: 2017=16.8 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=9.9 · 2020=12.1 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 2.8

Where R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Concrete finishing establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #127 safest of 166 Concrete finishing employers in California.

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R H Kiggins Construction, Inc.
R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

R H Kiggins Construction, Inc. has fewer employees than the Concrete finishing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 3.8 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2021 4.7 2.4 2 0 0
2020 12.1 10.4 7 0 0
2019 9.9 3.3 6 0 0
2018 8.2 6.2 4 0 0
2017 16.8 9.6 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · CA · Fresno

1,314 Concrete finishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gioia Concrete Construction Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graber & Graber Contractors Inc 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Form-Up Foundations LLC 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hill and Hill Construction 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Heglar Creek Dairy 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Zimmerman Metals, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Alderwood Landscaping Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillside Warehouse & Trucking Co., Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlas Masonry LLC. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adamson Plumbing Contractors, Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE 121 Austin 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE AnMed Home Health 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.