Railroad signalling equipment installation · Kentucky

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC

Nicholasville, KY · ~44 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Railroad signalling equipment installation workplace, earning a grade B.

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC: 1.9 TCR = 66% of Railroad signalling equipment installation BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC safety composite

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC injury rate improved

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=9.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Nicholasville, KY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/51
  • PHOTO Harbor Construction …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Harbor Construction Co., Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC averages 1.9 TCR (66% of the Railroad signalling equipment installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC falls in its industry

4,550 Railroad signalling equipment establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 51 Railroad signalling equipment employers in Kentucky.

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC (44 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC
R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC (44 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

R. J. Corman Signaling Company, LLC has fewer employees than the Railroad signalling equipment installati median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 9.2 3.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · KY · Nicholasville

4,550 Railroad signalling equipment installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 87 employers in Nicholasville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Harbor Construction Co., Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR G Technology 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR B&B Electric Services Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TruNorth solar LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE DMK Development Group 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC630 - Louisville, KY 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jett's Specialty Contracting, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Louisville Mechanical Services 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central KY - Jessamine County 3,846 FTE
CITY-NEAR CUMBERLAND 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR R. J. Corman Switching Company, LLC 465 FTE
CITY-NEAR McKehnie Vehicle Components 427 FTE
NAT-TCR WESSC West Shore Service Center 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR NAA 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Gainesville RPC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Destaco 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Parks - Operations 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeKalb Mechanical, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE NCO 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE NDE 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.