Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation · California

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc.

Hayward, CA · ~28 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation workplace, earning a grade C.

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. safety composite

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. held a steady TCR band

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Hayward, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/85
  • PHOTO Otis Elevator Compan…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Otis Elevator Company- NAA Headquarters Palm Beach Gardens (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.8

Where R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. falls in its industry

1,138 Garage door, commercial- or in establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 85 Garage door, commercial- or in employers in California.

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc.
R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

R & S Erection of Southern Alameda County, Inc. has fewer employees than the Garage door, commercial- or industrial-t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · CA · Hayward

1,138 Garage door, commercial- or industrial-type, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company- NAA Headquarters Palm Beach Gardens 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schindler US HQ 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schindler Holland R&D 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Anaheim 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Construction 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tampa Facility 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vita Craft Corporation 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE PS - Birmingham 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.