Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Wisconsin

Racine

Racine, WI · ~336 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Racine runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade C.

Racine: 2.2 TCR = 105% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Racine safety composite

Racine scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Racine injury rate improved

Racine's TCR fell 0.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Racine, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.2 · 105% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #31/87
  • PHOTO Buckeye Powe Sales -…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~336 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Buckeye Powe Sales - Blacklick (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Racine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Racine averages 2.2 TCR (105% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Racine TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=4 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=2 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 2.1

Where Racine falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 87 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Wisconsin.

Racine (336 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Racine
Racine (336 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Racine has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.0 1.3 14 0 0
2020 1.8 0.9 0 2 0
2019 0.8 0.0 0 1 0
2018 4.0 2.0 4 0 0
2017 3.5 1.8 6 0 0
2016 3.4 2.8 33 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · WI · Racine

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 111 employers in Racine, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Buckeye Powe Sales - Blacklick 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR fairchild Equipment - Menomonee Falls 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITW/Hobart Service-Charleston, SC Branch 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Wichita 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wisconsin - DePere 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guhring, Inc. - Wisconsin 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle 336 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zimbrick Fish Hatchery Rd 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-WIMIL98 1,550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Racine Offices 1,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIMIL98 ASCENSION ALL SAINTS HOSP - SPRING STREET 1,297 FTE
CITY-NEAR CNH Industrial - Racine Offices 944 FTE
NAT-TCR HDT Global Geneva 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fd Cif 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Mi - Gm Ppo 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Oklahoma City WWTP 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bihler of America, Inc 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hebron 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Consortium Business Support Services 336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shumate Mechanical LLC 336 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.