Induction heating equipment, industrial process-type, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Radyne Corporation

Milwaukee, WI · ~54 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Radyne Corporation runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Induction heating equipment, industrial process-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Radyne Corporation: 3.4 TCR = 103% of Induction heating equipment, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Radyne Corporation safety composite

Radyne Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2024

Radyne Corporation injury rate improved

Radyne Corporation's TCR fell 1.8 from 3.4 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=8.0 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333994 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 103% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/11
  • PHOTO Thermal Product Solu…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Thermal Product Solutions (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Radyne Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Radyne Corporation averages 3.4 TCR (103% of the Induction heating equipment, industrial process-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Radyne Corporation TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=8 · 2021=2 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Radyne Corporation falls in its industry

103 Induction heating equipment, i establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 11 Induction heating equipment, i employers in Wisconsin.

Radyne Corporation (54 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Radyne Corporation
Radyne Corporation (54 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Radyne Corporation has fewer employees than the Induction heating equipment, industrial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 0 1 0
2023 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2022 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2021 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 8.0 4.0 4 0 0
2019 4.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.4 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333994 · WI · Milwaukee

103 Induction heating equipment, industrial process-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Thermal Product Solutions 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPS, LLC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cherry Valley 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR TPS/Lindberg 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dairy Dreams LLC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&M Dittrich 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Utility Services, Inc- WI- Brownsville 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Payne & Dolan, Inc - Racine/Kensoha 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR 2488 - Western Hills 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1951 - Decatur 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1172 - Douglasville 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1038 - North Miami 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Apex Building Company 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Staton Companies 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sandridge Partners,LP 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carolina Livery Service 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.