Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) · Michigan

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants

Litchfield, MI · ~139 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) workplace, earning a grade B.

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants: 2.6 TCR = 58% of Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants safety composite

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants: 3.0 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2024

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants's TCR rose 1.5 from 3.0 in 2018 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111422 · Litchfield, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #7/28
  • PHOTO Pleasant Valley Farm…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~139 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pleasant Valley Farm Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raker-Roberta's Young Plants averages 2.6 TCR (58% of the Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants TCR series: 2018=3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.8 · 2023=4.7 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Raker-Roberta's Young Plants falls in its industry

166 Bedding plant growing (except establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 28 Bedding plant growing (except employers in Michigan.

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants (139 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Raker-Roberta's Young Plants
Raker-Roberta's Young Plants (139 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Raker-Roberta's Young Plants has more employees than the Bedding plant growing (except vegetable median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 0.9 5 0 0
2023 4.7 3.7 5 0 0
2020 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111422 · MI · Litchfield

166 Bedding plant growing (except vegetable and melon bedding plants) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 9 employers in Litchfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pleasant Valley Farm Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern Gardens Citrus Nursery, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR C3 Industries, Inc - Webberville (Indoor) 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR C3 Industries, Inc - Franklin 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE JH Campbell 3 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE CSM Group 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Site Development, Inc. 139 FTE
STATE-SIZE Turri's Italian Foods-RSVL 139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hi-Lex Controls, Inc. (HCIL) 422 FTE
CITY-NEAR HI-LEX Litchfield (HCIL) 384 FTE
CITY-NEAR HI-LEX Litchfield (HCIC) 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR HI-LEX CONTROLS, IN (HCIC) 103 FTE
NAT-TCR Steadfast Management Company, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR George W Reagan Company 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR REG Newton, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hitemco LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carpenter Industries Inc 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Technologies, Incorporated 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Jose Dc 139 FTE
NAT-SIZE International Control Services 139 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.