General Warehousing and Storage · California

Raley's 836-Distribution Center

Sacramento, CA · ~291 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raley's 836-Distribution Center runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Raley's 836-Distribution Center: 9.3 TCR = 160% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raley's 836-Distribution Center safety composite

Raley's 836-Distribution Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Raley's 836-Distribution Center: 9.6 → 13.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 13.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.23× in 2024

Raley's 836-Distribution Center's TCR rose 4.2 from 9.6 in 2018 to 13.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.3 · 160% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #946/1131
  • PHOTO MPW - Location 4141
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 164 inj
  • SIZE ~291 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MPW - Location 4141 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Raley's 836-Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raley's 836-Distribution Center averages 9.3 TCR (160% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raley's 836-Distribution Center TCR series: 2018=9.6 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=11.4 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=9.9 · 2024=13.8 · BLS 5.8

Where Raley's 836-Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #946 safest of 1131 General Warehousing and Storag employers in California.

Raley's 836-Distribution Center (291 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Raley's 836-Distribution Center
Raley's 836-Distribution Center (291 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Raley's 836-Distribution Center has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.8 11.5 30 0 0
2023 9.9 6.9 23 0 0
2022 0.6 0.4 14 0 0
2021 7.2 5.7 19 0 0
2020 11.4 11.1 31 1 0
2019 12.6 10.2 25 6 0
2018 9.6 4.6 22 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Sacramento

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MPW - Location 4141 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adams Warehousing 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AZ Metro Distributors LLC. 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Batesville Logistics - Chicago 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Madison Farms LLC 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pistachio Plant 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE Morada Produce Co LP 291 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCH Shafter Office 291 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR SL Sawmill 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Retail East - Romulus 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chautauqua Guest Home #3 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TXA009 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carlisle 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fox Contractors Corp 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adient, Pulaski Plant 291 FTE
NAT-SIZE SEDH 06 - Pasadena Branch 291 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.