Skilled nursing facilities · California

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center

Hemet, CA · ~156 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
43.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center runs at 671% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center: 43.6 TCR = 671% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center safety composite

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 43.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 32.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−36.1

2022→2024

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center injury rate improved

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center's TCR fell 36.1 from 78.1 in 2022 to 42.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 78.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=78.1 · 2023=45.2 · 2024=42.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Hemet, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 43.6 · 671% of ind

  • DART 32.9 DART
  • RANK #739/739
  • PHOTO Andover Manor Rehab …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing (13.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center averages 43.6 TCR (671% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center TCR series: 2022=78.1 · 2023=45.2 · 2024=42 · BLS 6.5

Where Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #739 safest of 739 Skilled nursing facilities employers in California.

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center (156 employees, TCR 43.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 01020304050 Average employees Total Case Rate Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center
Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center (156 employees, TCR 43.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Ramona Rehabilitation and Post Acute Care Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 42.0 32.9 16 35 0
2023 45.2 42.8 10 45 0
2022 78.1 76.6 4 103 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Hemet

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 72 employers in Hemet, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Shook Home 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 226_338 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-752 29.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bakersfield - Coffee Rd #032 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pittsburg #063 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9215-BUR 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olli Salumeria 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-050 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gosch Auto Group 565 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1853 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1853 409 FTE
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Neal Mast and Son Greenhouses 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE KeySource 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 347 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastern Sintered Alloys, Inc. 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.