Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Oregon

Ran Tech - Clackamas

Clackamas, OR · ~81 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ran Tech - Clackamas runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Ran Tech - Clackamas: 6.1 TCR = 184% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ran Tech - Clackamas safety composite

Ran Tech - Clackamas scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2017→2024

Ran Tech - Clackamas injury rate improved

Ran Tech - Clackamas's TCR fell 9.4 from 9.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.4 · 2018=10.6 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Clackamas, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.1 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO Pioneer Industries
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pioneer Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Ran Tech - Clackamas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ran Tech - Clackamas averages 6.1 TCR (184% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ran Tech - Clackamas TCR series: 2017=9.4 · 2018=10.6 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=4.4 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Ran Tech - Clackamas falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Oregon.

Ran Tech - Clackamas (81 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Ran Tech - Clackamas
Ran Tech - Clackamas (81 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Ran Tech - Clackamas has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.4 1.3 4 1 0
2022 4.4 4.4 3 0 0
2021 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2020 9.8 3.3 6 0 0
2019 6.2 2.6 7 0 0
2018 10.6 5.3 9 1 0
2017 9.4 8.0 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · OR · Clackamas

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 144 employers in Clackamas, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Industries 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MAX Aerostructures 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bandy Manufacturing, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US MS Meridian (1507) 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Ag - Western Business Unit 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ausland Builders, Inc. 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6400-SWY-0045-0045-08404 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Swire Coca-Cola of Eugene 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10810010 SUNNYSIDE MEDICAL CENTER SIM LAB 2,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-10810010 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-10110010 2,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR 422-DC001 942 FTE
NAT-TCR 5178 Fresenius Medical Care 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mackenzie Automatic Doors Inc. 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Guilford County Emergency Services - Fire 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Barro's Pizza, 40th St 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE TCCo-MI 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Duke Road 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale West University 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Design Distributors Inc 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.