Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground · North Carolina

Randolph County Emergency Services

Asheboro, NC · ~165 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Randolph County Emergency Services runs at 221% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground workplace, earning a grade F.

Randolph County Emergency Services: 8.4 TCR = 221% of Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Randolph County Emergency Services safety composite

Randolph County Emergency Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Randolph County Emergency Services: 4.5 → 12.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.39× in 2024

Randolph County Emergency Services's TCR rose 7.8 from 4.5 in 2023 to 12.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621910 · Asheboro, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 221% of ind

  • DART 11.6 DART
  • RANK #10/20
  • PHOTO Goodwill Hose Compan…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodwill Hose Company Ambulance Association (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Randolph County Emergency Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Randolph County Emergency Services averages 8.4 TCR (221% of the Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Randolph County Emergency Services TCR series: 2023=4.5 · 2024=12.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Randolph County Emergency Services falls in its industry

976 Emergency medical transportati establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 20 Emergency medical transportati employers in North Carolina.

Randolph County Emergency Services (165 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Randolph County Emergency Services
Randolph County Emergency Services (165 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 8.3

Randolph County Emergency Services has more employees than the Emergency medical transportation service median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.3 11.6 18 1 0
2023 4.5 3.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621910 · NC · Asheboro

976 Emergency medical transportation services, air or ground employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodwill Hose Company Ambulance Association 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Shore Health 60 Winter Street 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siouxland Paramedics, Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corpus Christi-Lexington 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Scott Farms Inc 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE FHG, Inc. 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA FLUID - WINSTON-SALEM NC-2221 PATTERSON 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monday Night Garden Co. 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR Tropicale Foods LLC 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Txfor - Independence Hub 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EB Ridges Care Center 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Builders Supply Co., Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ritchie & Page Distributing Co., Inc. 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Processed Metals Innovators, Inc. 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hyattsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wigre - Green Bay 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.