Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center

Asheboro, NC · ~143 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center: 6.3 TCR = 96% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2016→2018

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 1.9 from 7.4 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.4 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.4 · 2017=6.0 · 2018=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Asheboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.3 · 96% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #251/510
  • PHOTO Pine Haven Care Center
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~143 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pine Haven Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 6.3 TCR (96% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=7.4 · 2017=6 · 2018=5.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #251 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center (143 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center
Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center (143 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Randolph Health and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.5 4.7 7 0 0
2017 6.0 5.1 7 0 0
2016 7.4 6.6 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Asheboro

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pine Haven Care Center 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town and Country Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thurston Woods Village Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillcrest Mable Rose 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elkin 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Kentucky Statewide Operations 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bernhard MCC L.L.C. CNC 143 FTE
STATE-SIZE prestige farms 143 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR Craig HomeCare-Omaha 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Cibolo TX Truss 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Nacogdoches 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ramada 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sun State Components 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Taylorsville, LLC 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermo Fisher Scientific - Auburn, Alabama 143 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automatic Equipment/Blue Ox 143 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.