Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Indiana

Rawlins House

Pendleton, IN · ~129 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rawlins House runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Rawlins House: 3.6 TCR = 56% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rawlins House safety composite

Rawlins House scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Rawlins House injury rate improved

Rawlins House's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.9 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 13.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=13.7 · 2019=3.7 · 2021=1.0 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pendleton, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #117/640
  • PHOTO Arroyo Vista Nursing…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arroyo Vista Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Rawlins House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rawlins House averages 3.6 TCR (56% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rawlins House TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=4.6 · 2018=13.7 · 2019=3.7 · 2021=1 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Rawlins House falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #117 safest of 640 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Indiana.

Rawlins House (129 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rawlins House
Rawlins House (129 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Rawlins House has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 3 0 0
2023 1.7 0.0 1 1 0
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.7 2.2 5 0 0
2018 13.7 8.1 17 0 0
2017 4.6 3.8 6 0 0
2016 2.9 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IN · Pendleton

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 21 employers in Pendleton, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arroyo Vista Nursing Center 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NHC HealthCare, Sparta 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cherrywood Limited Partnership 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Savoy at Fort Lauderdale Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harmon Steel Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Superior Forest Products LLC 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huhtamaki, Inc. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montpelier MFG (EF, AUTO) 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tractor Supply Company Distribution Center 0114 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC 0114 453 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fredericks Inc 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR TOWN OF PENDLETON 62 FTE
NAT-TCR Terence Froman, Inc 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Prime Now LLC - UCA6 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - MTN6 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR PACE Supply Oakland Branch 10 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Warren Mott High Schools 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reeds Cove Health & Rehab 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE California Science Center (State) 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mukwonago 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.