Grape farming without making wine · California

Ray Moles Farms

Fresno, CA · ~237 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ray Moles Farms runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Grape farming without making wine workplace, earning a grade B.

Ray Moles Farms: 3.1 TCR = 69% of Grape farming without making wine BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ray Moles Farms safety composite

Ray Moles Farms scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ray Moles Farms: 1.1 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2023

Ray Moles Farms's TCR rose 3.9 from 1.1 in 2022 to 5.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111332 · Fresno, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 69% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #51/151
  • PHOTO Andrews Vineyards
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~237 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andrews Vineyards (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ray Moles Farms in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ray Moles Farms averages 3.1 TCR (69% of the Grape farming without making wine BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ray Moles Farms TCR series: 2022=1.1 · 2023=5 · BLS 4.5

Where Ray Moles Farms falls in its industry

162 Grape farming without making w establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 151 Grape farming without making w employers in California.

Ray Moles Farms (237 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Ray Moles Farms
Ray Moles Farms (237 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Ray Moles Farms has more employees than the Grape farming without making wine median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.0 3.4 6 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111332 · CA · Fresno

162 Grape farming without making wine employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andrews Vineyards 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR S-K Ranch Management, LLC - Escalon 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EKSC CORPORATION 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veloria DL Contracting 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aera Energy LLC- Belridge 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roseville, CA 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE Covi Concrete Construction 237 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION, INC. 237 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR TDH Nurseries LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Square of Elmhurst - FNS 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bancroft and Sons Transportation LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2123 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE RK Supply 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100007 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE USM Store #555 (United) 237 FTE
NAT-SIZE MTC 237 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.