Industrial building (except warehouses) construction · California

RCC Holdings, LLC (California)

Corona, CA · ~24 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RCC Holdings, LLC (California) runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Industrial building (except warehouses) construction workplace, earning a grade D.

RCC Holdings, LLC (California): 3.6 TCR = 123% of Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RCC Holdings, LLC (California) safety composite

RCC Holdings, LLC (California) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2021→2023

RCC Holdings, LLC (California) injury rate improved

RCC Holdings, LLC (California)'s TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.5 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Corona, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.6 · 123% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #43/78
  • PHOTO The Petry-Kuhne Comp…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Petry-Kuhne Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

RCC Holdings, LLC (California) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RCC Holdings, LLC (California) averages 3.6 TCR (123% of the Industrial building (except warehouses) construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RCC Holdings, LLC (California) TCR series: 2021=5.5 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.9

Where RCC Holdings, LLC (California) falls in its industry

924 Industrial building (except wa establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 78 Industrial building (except wa employers in California.

RCC Holdings, LLC (California) (24 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate RCC Holdings, LLC (California)
RCC Holdings, LLC (California) (24 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

RCC Holdings, LLC (California) has fewer employees than the Industrial building (except warehouses) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 5.5 5.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · CA · Corona

924 Industrial building (except warehouses) construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Petry-Kuhne Company 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR J Stephens Construction, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Titan Construction and Engineering Services Co 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Metal Tech. 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Apache Concrete Cutting, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Windsor 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #206 FAYETTEVILLE, NC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bernhard MCC, LLC - Fabrication 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accurate Measurement Controls, Inc 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashland AHQ 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adult Training Center 2 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE JEM Hospitality Group, LLC 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.