Facilities (except computer operation) support services · Georgia

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL)

Cartersville, GA · ~27 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Facilities (except computer operation) support services workplace, earning a grade A.

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL): 1.1 TCR = 42% of Facilities (except computer operation) support services BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) safety composite

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) held a steady TCR band

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.4 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Cartersville, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/36
  • PHOTO GEM Technologies, Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GEM Technologies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) averages 1.1 TCR (42% of the Facilities (except computer operation) support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.4 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.6

Where R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) falls in its industry

757 Facilities (except computer op establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 36 Facilities (except computer op employers in Georgia.

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) (27 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL)
R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) (27 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

R&D Maintenance Services, Inc. (AL) has fewer employees than the Facilities (except computer operation) s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · GA · Cartersville

757 Facilities (except computer operation) support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 145 employers in Cartersville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GEM Technologies, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cushman and Wakefield Verizon Account 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pegasus Support Services, LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT P&G ALBANY TRUCK SHOP 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Canon Pullet Farm 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE AKA Mulch Products, LLC 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grow Out 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Piedmont Water Company 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 15/1G 1,365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 15 1,294 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Cartersville Medical Center 643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cartersville Brewery 527 FTE
NAT-TCR Mondi Romeoville LLC 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Iron Works 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Upper Midwest : SVC-Chicago IL-USA 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cottages Huntsville 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yellowbird Foods 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ice Industries - Corporate Headquarters 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE SBS America LLC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.