Security and fire system, installation only · California

RDM Electric Co., Inc.

Ontario, CA · ~167 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RDM Electric Co., Inc. runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Security and fire system, installation only workplace, earning a grade C.

RDM Electric Co., Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 87% of Security and fire system, installation only BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RDM Electric Co., Inc. safety composite

RDM Electric Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

RDM Electric Co., Inc.: 2.0 → 3.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2024

RDM Electric Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 1.7 from 2.0 in 2018 to 3.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 87% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #233/548
  • PHOTO Penco Electrical Con…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~167 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Penco Electrical Contractors, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

RDM Electric Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RDM Electric Co., Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (87% of the Security and fire system, installation only BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RDM Electric Co., Inc. TCR series: 2018=2 · 2019=1.4 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 2.8

Where RDM Electric Co., Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Security and fire system, inst establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #233 safest of 548 Security and fire system, inst employers in California.

RDM Electric Co., Inc. (167 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate RDM Electric Co., Inc.
RDM Electric Co., Inc. (167 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

RDM Electric Co., Inc. has more employees than the Security and fire system, installation o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 1.5 5 0 0
2023 3.1 2.5 5 0 0
2022 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2019 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2018 2.0 1.3 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · Ontario

4,550 Security and fire system, installation only employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Penco Electrical Contractors, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Electric Group 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFW Electric Group, LLC. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gigerich Electrical INC 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE C2F Employment Inc. 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE FIGUEROA PLAZA 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 167 FTE
STATE-SIZE NA-US-CA-San Jose-2711 N 1st St 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Parsons Government Center - General Government 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR S02948 - Harlem River Yard Transfer Station 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Finkl Steel 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chapman Partnership Homestead 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brothers 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fabbrica LLC Office + Factory 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sarah D Culbertson Memorial Hospital 167 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Kutter 167 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.