Scheduled air passenger transportation · North Carolina

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport

Morrisville, NC · ~105 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Scheduled air passenger transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport: 2.4 TCR = 53% of Scheduled air passenger transportation BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport safety composite

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2023

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport injury rate improved

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Morrisville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/46
  • PHOTO SAN - Maintenance
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SAN - Maintenance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport averages 2.4 TCR (53% of the Scheduled air passenger transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=1 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled air passenger transp establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 46 Scheduled air passenger transp employers in North Carolina.

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport (105 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport
RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport (105 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

RDU Raleigh-Durham Airport has more employees than the Scheduled air passenger transportation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.7 4.5 5 0 0
2021 5.4 0.0 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.9 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2016 3.4 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · NC · Morrisville

1,568 Scheduled air passenger transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 219 employers in Morrisville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SAN - Maintenance 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delta Air Lines - TPA 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles Maintenance Alaska 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 76100001--CHICAGO UNITED AIR BAG 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE UFO-Utilities 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Omega Construction, Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Curtin Trucking and Drainage Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advance Concrete 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Development Drive 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC_Morrisville_4200 Paramount Pkwy_ECA42PAR 962 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Think Place 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teleflex Morrisville 649 FTE
NAT-TCR Coaster-FL 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5179 Sicklerville, NJ 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Performance Pulsation Control 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cortland Healthcare 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bear Mountain at Reading 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Voss Manufacturing Inc 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Binghamton, NY 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Health Express 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.