Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers · Pennsylvania

Reading Distribution

Reading, PA · ~25 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reading Distribution runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Reading Distribution: 0.4 TCR = 17% of Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reading Distribution safety composite

Reading Distribution scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Reading Distribution held a steady TCR band

Reading Distribution's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Reading, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/43
  • PHOTO Salt Lake City Distr…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Salt Lake City Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Reading Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reading Distribution averages 0.4 TCR (17% of the Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reading Distribution TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Reading Distribution falls in its industry

766 Other Chemical and Allied Prod establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 43 Other Chemical and Allied Prod employers in Pennsylvania.

Reading Distribution (25 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Reading Distribution
Reading Distribution (25 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Reading Distribution has fewer employees than the Other Chemical and Allied Products Merch median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · PA · Reading

766 Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Salt Lake City Distribution 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hays, KS OV104 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bayport Distribution 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer New Holland NHL1 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hunterstown Power Generation 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Producer 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warren Electric Cooperative, Inc. 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Paterson Wa (Watts Farming) 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0083-HES Bossier City LA Industrial 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Allstate Paper Box Company 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hershey Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kent Distribution 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Great Lakes Valley View 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta-MD 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spa Hotel LLC - Residence Inn Saratoga 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.