Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial · Pennsylvania

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc.

Reading, PA · ~22 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.9
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. runs at 518% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial workplace, earning a grade F.

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc.: 10.9 TCR = 518% of Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. safety composite

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc.: 8.2 → 24.4 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 24.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2018

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc.'s TCR rose 16.2 from 8.2 in 2016 to 24.4 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.9 · 518% of ind

  • DART 12.2 DART
  • RANK #133/137
  • PHOTO Fergus Falls
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fergus Falls (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. averages 10.9 TCR (518% of the Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=24.4 · BLS 2.1

Where Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Electric motor repair and main establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #133 safest of 137 Electric motor repair and main employers in Pennsylvania.

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. (22 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Reading Electric Motor Service Inc.
Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. (22 employees, TCR 10.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Reading Electric Motor Service Inc. has fewer employees than the Electric motor repair and maintenance se median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 24.4 12.2 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.2 8.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · PA · Reading

2,560 Electric motor repair and maintenance services, commercial or industrial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fergus Falls 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR NE 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Parts - Phoenix 10.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICE 10.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dawson's Orchards 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kuhn Orchards, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giorgi Mushroom Farm 3 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Hope 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR The Bridge At Farmington 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Heartland Ag - Iowa 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 40 Kenwood Circle 10.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Fox Run 10.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE DPW Administration & Streets 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Spencer Companies, Inc., Corporate Office 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Klein-Dickert Co., Inc. - Madison 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Chemical Rycoline Mfg 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.