Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Reading Plant

Reading, PA · ~149 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reading Plant runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Reading Plant: 5.0 TCR = 151% of Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reading Plant safety composite

Reading Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Reading Plant: 2.9 → 10.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2023

Reading Plant's TCR rose 7.4 from 2.9 in 2021 to 10.3 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 151% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #31/32
  • PHOTO Specialized Products…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~149 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Specialized Products Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Reading Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reading Plant averages 5.0 TCR (151% of the Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reading Plant TCR series: 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=10.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Reading Plant falls in its industry

334 Harness assemblies for electro establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 32 Harness assemblies for electro employers in Pennsylvania.

Reading Plant (149 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Reading Plant
Reading Plant (149 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Reading Plant has more employees than the Harness assemblies for electronic use ma median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 10.3 3.1 4 6 0
2022 1.8 0.0 0 2 0
2021 2.9 1.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · PA · Reading

334 Harness assemblies for electronic use manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Specialized Products Main 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR keystone Electronics 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BE Aerospace - Simpsonville 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Menomonee Falls Plant 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jaindl Farms LLC 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Construction Company, Inc 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Pennsylvania - Blue Bell - Gas Operations (60G1) 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE OMNOVA SOLUTIONS INC 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Hazelton 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AIG Tennessee 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lci - 241 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1831 LaPlace, Louisiana 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE IFF Gibson City 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE ccof Inc 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (UCG-6458) 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (DET2-6441) 149 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.