Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) · Pennsylvania

Reads Moving Systems Inc.

Huntingdon Valley, PA · ~25 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reads Moving Systems Inc. runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Reads Moving Systems Inc.: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reads Moving Systems Inc. safety composite

Reads Moving Systems Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Reads Moving Systems Inc. held a steady TCR band

Reads Moving Systems Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Huntingdon Valley, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/172
  • PHOTO Quality Logistics Inc
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Logistics Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Reads Moving Systems Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reads Moving Systems Inc. averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Reads Moving Systems Inc. TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Reads Moving Systems Inc. falls in its industry

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 172 Motor freight carrier, general employers in Pennsylvania.

Reads Moving Systems Inc. (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Reads Moving Systems Inc.
Reads Moving Systems Inc. (25 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Reads Moving Systems Inc. has fewer employees than the Motor freight carrier, general, long-dis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · PA · Huntingdon Valley

3,252 Motor freight carrier, general, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 37 employers in Huntingdon Valley, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Logistics Inc 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 300000170856345 - WI-Green Bay-RBC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lowell, AR - JB Hunt Corporate A Marketing 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR EVANS DELIVERY COMPANY INC 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moxie Pest Control (Philadelphia) 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE CRH Commissary 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elite Property Management 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kimberton Whole Foods Distribution Center 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate and Field 1,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106509 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT FOOD STORES 6509 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carr & Duff, Inc. 200 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CAPAVI-USA INC. dba Industrial Piping & Certified Welding Co.,Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cool Earth Solar Development, LLC 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Two Men and a Truck- NKY 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Two Men and a Truck- Lexington 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.