Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · California

Rebekah Children's Services

Gilroy, CA · ~238 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rebekah Children's Services runs at 283% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade F.

Rebekah Children's Services: 10.8 TCR = 283% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rebekah Children's Services safety composite

Rebekah Children's Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2019→2023

Rebekah Children's Services injury rate improved

Rebekah Children's Services's TCR fell 3.9 from 10.5 in 2019 to 6.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 21.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.5 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=21.8 · 2023=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Gilroy, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 283% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #76/91
  • PHOTO 538337 MI137 W HOLTO…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~238 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 538337 MI137 W HOLTON WHITEHALL RD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rebekah Children's Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rebekah Children's Services averages 10.8 TCR (283% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rebekah Children's Services TCR series: 2019=10.5 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=21.8 · 2023=6.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Rebekah Children's Services falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 91 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in California.

Rebekah Children's Services (238 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Rebekah Children's Services
Rebekah Children's Services (238 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Rebekah Children's Services has more employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.6 2.2 8 1 0
2022 21.8 12.2 8 17 0
2021 4.1 4.1 5 0 0
2019 10.5 2.9 8 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · CA · Gilroy

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 113 employers in Gilroy, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 538337 MI137 W HOLTON WHITEHALL RD 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 571603 184390_5150 GRIMES BLVD_ABI 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flourtown NC 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garfield House 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Panoche Creek Packing 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guerrero Labor Contractor 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enphase Energy Fremont, CA 238 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division #9 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 9 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Christopher Ranch LLC 660 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0010-00100005 475 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olam West Coast 450 FTE
NAT-TCR 603 - Hattiesburg 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CSR Roofing Contractors, Inc. 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD #695 - High School 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-03136 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marketing Alliance Samples INC 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (8) 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Pine Electric 238 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Ssm Health Sluh Es 238 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.