Mechanical contractors · Texas

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS

College Station, TX · ~100 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Mechanical contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS: 3.2 TCR = 113% of Mechanical contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS safety composite

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS injury rate improved

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS's TCR fell 0.5 from 4.2 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · College Station, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 113% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #241/408
  • PHOTO RRSC Austin
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RRSC Austin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS averages 3.2 TCR (113% of the Mechanical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 2.8

Where R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS falls in its industry

5,793 Mechanical contractors establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #241 safest of 408 Mechanical contractors employers in Texas.

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS (100 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS
R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS (100 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

R.E.C. Industries, Inc BCS has more employees than the Mechanical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 2.5 3 0 0
2023 3.1 0.0 3 0 0
2022 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2020 5.5 2.2 5 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2018 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2017 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2016 4.2 3.2 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · TX · College Station

5,793 Mechanical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 149 employers in College Station, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RRSC Austin 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RRSC Pittsburgh 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Limbach - Michigan 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Antenucci, Inc. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Revol Greens - TX 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakota Utility Contractors LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClung Energy Services, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCI03-FPC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - College Station 1,289 FTE
CITY-NEAR College Station Office 991 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott & White Hospital - College Station 819 FTE
CITY-NEAR College Station,TX 725 FTE
NAT-TCR East Arkansas Area Agency on Aging- Craighead 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Avon 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lee Fence and Outdoor 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill Painesville Store 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE AVI, Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fisher Auto Parts - OHWHSE 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Howard Concrete Pumping Company 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harvard Maintenance Inc of Arizona 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.