Solid Waste Collection · California

Recology Yuba Sutter

Marysville, CA · ~133 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.2
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Recology Yuba Sutter runs at 546% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Solid Waste Collection workplace, earning a grade F.

Recology Yuba Sutter: 14.2 TCR = 546% of Solid Waste Collection BLS 2.6 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Recology Yuba Sutter safety composite

Recology Yuba Sutter scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2017→2024

Recology Yuba Sutter injury rate improved

Recology Yuba Sutter's TCR fell 5.0 from 18.8 in 2017 to 13.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.8 · 2018=21.6 · 2019=19.3 · 2020=9.1 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=13.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Marysville, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.2 · 546% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #208/247
  • PHOTO Tahoe Truckee Sierra…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 161 inj
  • SIZE ~133 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tahoe Truckee Sierra Disposal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Recology Yuba Sutter in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Recology Yuba Sutter averages 14.2 TCR (546% of the Solid Waste Collection BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Recology Yuba Sutter TCR series: 2017=18.8 · 2018=21.6 · 2019=19.3 · 2020=9.1 · 2021=12.6 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=13.9 · BLS 2.6

Where Recology Yuba Sutter falls in its industry

2,322 Solid Waste Collection establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #208 safest of 247 Solid Waste Collection employers in California.

Recology Yuba Sutter (133 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Recology Yuba Sutter
Recology Yuba Sutter (133 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Recology Yuba Sutter has more employees than the Solid Waste Collection median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.9 7.3 21 0 0
2023 10.1 6.0 15 0 0
2022 8.2 4.8 12 0 0
2021 12.6 6.3 18 0 0
2020 9.1 6.3 13 0 0
2019 19.3 11.0 28 0 0
2018 21.6 11.6 30 0 0
2017 18.8 8.6 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · Marysville

2,322 Solid Waste Collection employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Marysville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tahoe Truckee Sierra Disposal 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conwaste Recogido San Juan Avenidas 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Garbage to Garden 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWS- Daly City 14.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE RNC NUNEZ LABOR CONTRACTING 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALINC SERVICES, INC. 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 13101 SEPULVEDA 133 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Coast Framing, Inc. 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 64 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 583 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 619 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 57 2,054 FTE
NAT-TCR Police Department 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay Cast at Webster St 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0736 Athens 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Conwaste Recogido San Juan Avenidas 14.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Betty Dain Creations, LLC 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wadman Corporation 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Barrington Park District 133 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nexion Health Management Inc 133 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.