Landscape care and maintenance services · California

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District

Wilmington, CA · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District: 10.6 TCR = 236% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District safety composite

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2017→2018

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District injury rate improved

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District's TCR fell 7.0 from 14.1 in 2017 to 7.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.1 · 2018=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Wilmington, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 236% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #343/448
  • PHOTO Beebe Landscape Serv…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beebe Landscape Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District averages 10.6 TCR (236% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District TCR series: 2017=14.1 · 2018=7.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #343 safest of 448 Landscape care and maintenance employers in California.

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District (42 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District
Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District (42 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Recreation and Parks, Banning Maint District has fewer employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 7.1 7.1 3 0 0
2017 14.1 14.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · CA · Wilmington

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 58 employers in Wilmington, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beebe Landscape Services, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 155231 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5033 - York 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carson Landscape Industries 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR TraPac, LLC 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips 66 Los Angeles 600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Refinery Wilmington 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valero Wilmington Refinery 389 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort Myers (Flfms) 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Quality Companies, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Broughton Hospital 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Co 800 Maines Food & Party Warehouse 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Samaritas 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Region 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Rapids Center (Mibgr) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cadillac (Micad) 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.