Landscape care and maintenance services · California

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District

Lake View Terrace, CA · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District runs at 432% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District: 19.4 TCR = 432% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District safety composite

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District: 13.9 → 24.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 24.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District's TCR rose 11.0 from 13.9 in 2017 to 24.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Lake View Terrace, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.4 · 432% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #426/448
  • PHOTO Coastal Pacific Land…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Coastal Pacific Landscape Management, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District averages 19.4 TCR (432% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District TCR series: 2017=13.9 · 2018=24.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #426 safest of 448 Landscape care and maintenance employers in California.

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District (67 employees, TCR 19.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District
Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District (67 employees, TCR 19.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Recreation and Parks, Hansen Dam District has more employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 24.9 0.0 4 0 0
2017 13.9 8.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · CA · Lake View Terrace

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 9 employers in Lake View Terrace, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Coastal Pacific Landscape Management, Inc. 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Woods Landscape Maintenance 19.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rancho Cienega District Maint. 19.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Venice District Maint. 19.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sonoma GVIC Ranches 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE MUGU RANCH PARTNERSHIP 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Travaille and Phippen, Inc. 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nurseries 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Superior Gunite 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR RECREATION AND PARKS, HANSEN DAM POOL 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hansen Dam Aquatic Center 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDV 61 FTE
NAT-TCR #98 Art Van Warehouse 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Two Men And A Truck 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZYON 19.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kitsap Humane Society 19.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Enterprise Center (Alent) 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbus (Incol) 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garden City (Ksgar) 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Health Care (Kyout) 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.