Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction · Wisconsin

Red Barn Wind Farm

Monfort, WI · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red Barn Wind Farm runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Red Barn Wind Farm: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red Barn Wind Farm safety composite

Red Barn Wind Farm scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2022→2023

Red Barn Wind Farm injury rate improved

Red Barn Wind Farm's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.8 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Monfort, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/40
  • PHOTO CMS Wireless
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CMS Wireless (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Red Barn Wind Farm in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red Barn Wind Farm averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red Barn Wind Farm TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Red Barn Wind Farm falls in its industry

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geot establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 40 Alternative energy (e.g., geot employers in Wisconsin.

Red Barn Wind Farm (50 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Red Barn Wind Farm
Red Barn Wind Farm (50 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Red Barn Wind Farm has fewer employees than the Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, oc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · WI · Monfort

1,605 Alternative energy (e.g., geothermal, ocean wave, solar, wind) structure construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CMS Wireless 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7102106 DUKE Pisgah Ridge 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PraXel Line Services 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riggs Distler & Company Inc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ferguson's Morningside Orchard LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windsor 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pagels Ponderosa Cropping LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&M Dittrich Mink Farm 50 FTE
NAT-TCR Franklin County Court of Justice 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kse Radio Ventures LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylors Falls Elem 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PRZ Technologies Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amac Enterprises, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE H & H Foradory Construction, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tilden Community Center 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Up & Out, Inc. 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.