Automotive washing and polishing · California

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty

Fresno, CA · ~117 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty runs at 179% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automotive washing and polishing workplace, earning a grade D.

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty: 3.8 TCR = 179% of Automotive washing and polishing BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty safety composite

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2017→2024

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty injury rate improved

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty's TCR fell 6.4 from 8.7 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.7 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811192 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.8 · 179% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #20/39
  • PHOTO Benny's Car Wash Per…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Benny's Car Wash Perkins Road (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty averages 3.8 TCR (179% of the Automotive washing and polishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=1.5 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty falls in its industry

237 Automotive washing and polishi establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 39 Automotive washing and polishi employers in California.

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty (117 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty
Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty (117 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Red Carpet Car Wash Shaw and Marty has more employees than the Automotive washing and polishing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2023 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2022 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2021 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2019 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2018 5.2 1.7 3 0 0
2017 8.7 3.5 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811192 · CA · Fresno

237 Automotive washing and polishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Benny's Car Wash Perkins Road 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 322 - Lake Wylie 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 084 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sam's Xpress Car Wash 323 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frog Hollow Farm LLC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Standard Cattle LLC 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE LFA 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oxnard Plant #4 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR East Muskegon Roofing and Sheet Metal Co. Inc 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 004-Nike Air Manufacturing Oregon 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Parkview Markets 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Industrial Sales and Service 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Macon County Courthouse 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Factor Sales, Inc. Del Sol Ace 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE CE Electronics 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE 480 Bedford Road Chappaqua 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.