Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Nevada

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC

Las Vegas, NV · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC: 2.7 TCR = 72% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC safety composite

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2017→2018

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC injury rate improved

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC's TCR fell 5.5 from 5.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.5 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Las Vegas, NV AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/52
  • PHOTO CCAL RE 2013, LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCAL RE 2013, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC averages 2.7 TCR (72% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC TCR series: 2017=5.5 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 52 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Nevada.

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC (40 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC
Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC (40 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Red Rock Senior Living Leasing, LLC has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.5 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NV · Las Vegas

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 2,247 employers in Las Vegas, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCAL RE 2013, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atrium at Liberty Park 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Tyler South 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Laurelwood 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nevada American Construction LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE DLT Washington 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE MC4 Construction, LLC 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Centerline Structural Innovations Inc 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wynn Las Vegas 12,830 FTE
CITY-NEAR Venetian Casino Resort, LLC 8,538 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Nevada, Las Vegas 8,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bellagio llc 6,383 FTE
NAT-TCR Potlatch Land & Lumber, LLC. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR NFPG1 - Corporate Office - PlGrove 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Staybridge Suites College Station 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PS-CAK-AKRON-CANTON-PS 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lignetics of Idaho 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE # 1 Cochran Subaru of Butler County 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aap Lakeland (Fllan) 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Addison B Building (Iladb) 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.