Coffee concentrates (i.e., instant coffee) manufacturing · Virginia

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster

Floyd, VA · ~43 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Coffee concentrates (i.e., instant coffee) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster: 1.9 TCR = 48% of Coffee concentrates (i.e., instant coffee) manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster safety composite

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2019→2024

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster injury rate improved

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster's TCR fell 9.1 from 9.1 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311920 · Floyd, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Twin Valley Coffee
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Twin Valley Coffee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red Rooster Coffee Roaster averages 1.9 TCR (48% of the Coffee concentrates (i.e., instant coffee) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster TCR series: 2019=9.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.1

Where Red Rooster Coffee Roaster falls in its industry

169 Coffee concentrates (i.e., ins establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Coffee concentrates (i.e., ins employers in Virginia.

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster (43 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Red Rooster Coffee Roaster
Red Rooster Coffee Roaster (43 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Red Rooster Coffee Roaster has fewer employees than the Coffee concentrates (i.e., instant coffe median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.1 9.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311920 · VA · Floyd

169 Coffee concentrates (i.e., instant coffee) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 10 employers in Floyd, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Twin Valley Coffee 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berner Baxter Warehouse 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cometeer Gloucester 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TN - Newport 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tahoe Hydro 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Elkwood 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prospect Solar LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water and Sewer 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wall Residences, Inc. 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Floyd 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR 02107 - STORE # 2107 FLOYD 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crenshaw Lighting 74 FTE
NAT-TCR Neway Packaging Corporation 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Star Equipment Ltd - Cedar Rapids 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Grasmere Place LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Maricopa County - Adult Probation (110) 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ambassador Sanitation Management @ Filet of Chicken 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific Concrete Cutting & Coring, Inc.- Oahu Office 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pineland Farms Natural Meats, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterson's Welding and Machine 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.