Construction management, commercial and institutional building · Pennsylvania

Red Rose Interior Inc

Lancaster, PA · ~63 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red Rose Interior Inc runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

Red Rose Interior Inc: 6.2 TCR = 215% of Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red Rose Interior Inc safety composite

Red Rose Interior Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2024

Red Rose Interior Inc injury rate improved

Red Rose Interior Inc's TCR fell 3.8 from 6.0 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=10.5 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 215% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #211/251
  • PHOTO Refrigeration Design…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Refrigeration Design Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Red Rose Interior Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red Rose Interior Inc averages 6.2 TCR (215% of the Construction management, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red Rose Interior Inc TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=10.5 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=8.8 · 2023=3.9 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 2.9

Where Red Rose Interior Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Construction management, comme establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #211 safest of 251 Construction management, comme employers in Pennsylvania.

Red Rose Interior Inc (63 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Red Rose Interior Inc
Red Rose Interior Inc (63 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Red Rose Interior Inc has more employees than the Construction management, commercial and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2023 3.9 1.9 2 0 0
2022 8.8 5.3 4 1 0
2021 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2020 7.1 1.8 4 0 0
2019 5.8 4.3 4 0 0
2018 8.6 7.2 6 0 0
2017 10.5 9.0 7 0 0
2016 6.0 6.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · PA · Lancaster

4,692 Construction management, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Refrigeration Design Technologies 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Briner Building Inc 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR UIC Construction 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BluSky Restoration Contractors Orlando 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hillandale Gettysburg LP DBA Hillandale Farms - Atlantic 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Evergreen Oilfield Solutions 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shadco LLC 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Central Paradise Valley 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Castle Pines Golf Club 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Germantown Hardware 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Roberts Capitol, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wepfer Marine of Calvert City 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ventura Foods 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston, WV 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE 149 Miami Gardens 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.