Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC

Redlands, CA · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC runs at 400% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC: 15.2 TCR = 400% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC safety composite

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC: 7.4 → 23.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 23.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.36× in 2024

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC's TCR rose 15.7 from 7.4 in 2023 to 23.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Redlands, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.2 · 400% of ind

  • DART 20.7 DART
  • RANK #507/635
  • PHOTO Oakmont of Riverpark
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oakmont of Riverpark (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redland MC Care Properties, LLC averages 15.2 TCR (400% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC TCR series: 2023=7.4 · 2024=23.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Redland MC Care Properties, LLC falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #507 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC (51 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redland MC Care Properties, LLC
Redland MC Care Properties, LLC (51 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Redland MC Care Properties, LLC has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 23.1 20.7 10 0 0
2023 7.4 7.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Redlands

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 180 employers in Redlands, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oakmont of Riverpark 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Jose Gardens 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MBK - The Montera 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asbury Chandler Estate 15.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Robert Young Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE H&W Vineyards 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huber Farms Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Brothers Farms Inc 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burlington Redlands #517 1,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-010 912 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGB4 776 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB4 762 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HDT9 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Water Restoration Group 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Azria Health Clarinda 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Major Metals Company 15.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montana Linen Supply LLC 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Albuquerque 10137 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tempe 10427 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMAHA Electrical, Inc. 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.