Grocery stores · Pennsylvania

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside

Reading, PA · ~65 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Grocery stores workplace, earning a grade D.

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside: 5.7 TCR = 167% of Grocery stores BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside safety composite

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside held a steady TCR band

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 167% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #785/1287
  • PHOTO Store 1089
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Store 1089 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside averages 5.7 TCR (167% of the Grocery stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=8.2 · 2022=4 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.4

Where Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside falls in its industry

30,654 Grocery stores establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #785 safest of 1287 Grocery stores employers in Pennsylvania.

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside (65 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside
Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside (65 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Redner's Warehouse Market Pennside has fewer employees than the Grocery stores median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.9 3.9 3 0 0
2022 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2021 8.2 8.2 4 0 0
2020 10.1 8.1 5 0 0
2019 6.6 2.2 3 0 0
2018 14.1 14.1 6 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · PA · Reading

30,654 Grocery stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Store 1089 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LMMM Dallas #23, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dave's Fresh Marketplace of Greenville 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 021-00418 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Star Roses and Plants 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. - Willow Grove 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yoe Construction, Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yoe Industrial Services 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Liberty Steel Products of North Jackson, LLC. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 33 Midcoast Road 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mervis Iron & Metal 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Plaskolite West, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3081 Keystone Miami 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Geauga Mechanical Co., Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #50 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE LSB - Bloomington 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.