Retirement communities, continuing care · Pennsylvania

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare

Greensburg, PA · ~266 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare runs at 152% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade D.

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare: 5.8 TCR = 152% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare safety composite

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare held a steady TCR band

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare's TCR held near 0.3 from 8.1 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Greensburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 152% of ind

  • DART 5.8 DART
  • RANK #86/257
  • PHOTO LEGACY VILLAGE OF SU…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 111 inj
  • SIZE ~266 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEGACY VILLAGE OF SUGAR HOUSE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare averages 5.8 TCR (152% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=4 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=4.6 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 257 Retirement communities, contin employers in Pennsylvania.

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare (266 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare
Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare (266 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Redstone Presbyterian SeniorCare has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 5.8 14 2 0
2023 4.6 3.1 9 0 0
2022 6.1 4.3 9 1 0
2021 4.0 3.0 8 0 0
2020 4.7 4.3 10 0 0
2019 5.5 3.8 11 2 0
2018 5.4 3.6 14 1 0
2017 5.8 4.2 13 1 0
2016 8.1 5.0 23 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Greensburg

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 129 employers in Greensburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEGACY VILLAGE OF SUGAR HOUSE 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Susquehanna 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Addington Place of Clinton 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR UHC Nashville 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mill Hall 120 Airstrip Dr, Mill Hall, PA 17751 266 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allan Myers, Inc. 266 FTE
STATE-SIZE NPX ONE - Reading, PA 266 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avo Photonics, Inc. 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmoreland Hospital 1,943 FTE
CITY-NEAR Westmoreland Regional Hospital 1,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR West Penn Power 695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scott Electric 663 FTE
NAT-TCR 1120 Summerville 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1777 Wade Green 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6652 Napa 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Stephen F Austin - EastColl DH 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DLF1 266 FTE
NAT-SIZE Child & Family Resources, Inc. 266 FTE
NAT-SIZE TransPak - DIV 145 TechRidge Austin 266 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenwood Village, CO 266 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.