Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Redwood Retirement Residence

Napa, CA · ~27 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redwood Retirement Residence runs at 157% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Redwood Retirement Residence: 6.0 TCR = 157% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redwood Retirement Residence safety composite

Redwood Retirement Residence scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−14.9

2017→2022

Redwood Retirement Residence injury rate improved

Redwood Retirement Residence's TCR fell 14.9 from 14.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 15.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.9 · 2018=15.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Napa, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 157% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #144/635
  • PHOTO Chandler MC I, LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chandler MC I, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Redwood Retirement Residence in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redwood Retirement Residence averages 6.0 TCR (157% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redwood Retirement Residence TCR series: 2017=14.9 · 2018=15.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Redwood Retirement Residence falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #144 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Redwood Retirement Residence (27 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redwood Retirement Residence
Redwood Retirement Residence (27 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Redwood Retirement Residence has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 15.7 0.0 3 0 0
2017 14.9 9.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Napa

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 186 employers in Napa, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chandler MC I, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10845 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coventry House of Siler City 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Point at Lifespring Senior Living 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 532 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Department of State Hospitals-Napa 2,248 FTE
CITY-NEAR Napa County 1,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2004-00001420 1,142 FTE
NAT-TCR Office 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Alphonsus Medical Center Nampa 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LTD 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Express Managed Services 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Garden City Office and Warehouse 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ponder Creek Estates 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pinecrest 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pearl Crossing 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.