Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating · Minnesota

Reese Enterprises, Inc.

Rosemount, MN · ~45 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reese Enterprises, Inc. runs at 345% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating workplace, earning a grade F.

Reese Enterprises, Inc.: 11.4 TCR = 345% of Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reese Enterprises, Inc. safety composite

Reese Enterprises, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Reese Enterprises, Inc.: 5.1 → 21.1 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 21.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2021

Reese Enterprises, Inc.'s TCR rose 16.0 from 5.1 in 2016 to 21.1 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325211 · Rosemount, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.4 · 345% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #15/15
  • PHOTO 3M - Tonawanda
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 3M - Tonawanda (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Reese Enterprises, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reese Enterprises, Inc. averages 11.4 TCR (345% of the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reese Enterprises, Inc. TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=12.1 · 2018=9.5 · 2019=10.3 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=21.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Reese Enterprises, Inc. falls in its industry

644 Plastics and synthetic resins establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 15 Plastics and synthetic resins employers in Minnesota.

Reese Enterprises, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Reese Enterprises, Inc.
Reese Enterprises, Inc. (45 employees, TCR 11.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Reese Enterprises, Inc. has fewer employees than the Plastics and synthetic resins regenerati median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 21.1 7.0 6 3 0
2020 10.3 2.6 2 2 0
2019 10.3 0.0 3 1 0
2018 9.5 0.0 0 4 0
2017 12.1 0.0 1 4 0
2016 5.1 5.1 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325211 · MN · Rosemount

644 Plastics and synthetic resins regenerating, precipitating, and coagulating employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Rosemount, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 3M - Tonawanda 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Synray corporation 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFR Industries 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seljan Company 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE District 45 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allstar Construction Commercial Op Co, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doran Construction Company, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hasslen Construction Company, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Independent School District 196 4,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC 905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 917 Rosemount 559 FTE
NAT-TCR The Home City Ice Company - Huntsville - 530 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chestnut Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashville Growout 11.4 TCR
NAT-TCR el super #56 corona 11.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richardson #533 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE EIT Elizabethtown 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7861-Enphg-Franklin College 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Titan Steel Corp 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.