Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Michigan

refrigeration concepts inc.

Comstock Park, MI · ~34 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

refrigeration concepts inc. runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

refrigeration concepts inc.: 1.1 TCR = 50% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

refrigeration concepts inc. safety composite

refrigeration concepts inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

refrigeration concepts inc. held a steady TCR band

refrigeration concepts inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Comstock Park, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/114
  • PHOTO Crown Lift Trucks Sa…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crown Lift Trucks Salt Lake (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

refrigeration concepts inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows refrigeration concepts inc. averages 1.1 TCR (50% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

refrigeration concepts inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where refrigeration concepts inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 114 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Michigan.

refrigeration concepts inc. (34 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate refrigeration concepts inc.
refrigeration concepts inc. (34 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

refrigeration concepts inc. has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · MI · Comstock Park

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 61 employers in Comstock Park, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Salt Lake 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Offshore Equipment Solutions, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DHMS - Victoria 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITS ConGlobal Sawtell Depot 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GS Ashley LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sportel Greenhouses, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coldwater 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dearborn Industrial Generation LLC 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR NBHX Trim USA 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1923 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1923 334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perrin, Inc. 332 FTE
NAT-TCR General Welding & Fabrication Inc 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR INVISTA, Camden 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Crafco, Inc. - Cheyenne 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR McIntosh 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE First Four Petroleum Group, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE RapidView, LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rj Liebe Athletic Lettering Co 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Branch 7025 - WP Knoxville 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.