Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system · Hawaii

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard

Honolulu, HI · ~114 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard runs at 1918% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade F.

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard: 23.0 TCR = 1918% of Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard safety composite

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.1

2016→2019

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard injury rate improved

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard's TCR fell 6.1 from 24.9 in 2016 to 18.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 28.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=24.9 · 2017=19.4 · 2018=28.9 · 2019=18.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Honolulu, HI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 23.0 · 1918% of ind

  • DART 12.8 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO Waste Water Treatment
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 108 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waste Water Treatment (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard averages 23.0 TCR (1918% of the Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard TCR series: 2016=24.9 · 2017=19.4 · 2018=28.9 · 2019=18.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard falls in its industry

400 Waste collection, treatment, a establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Waste collection, treatment, a employers in Hawaii.

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard (114 employees, TCR 23.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard
Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard (114 employees, TCR 23.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Refuse Division - Honolulu Collection Yard has more employees than the Waste collection, treatment, and disposa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 18.9 12.8 22 0 0
2018 28.9 24.1 34 2 0
2017 19.4 13.5 22 1 0
2016 24.9 22.4 30 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · HI · Honolulu

400 Waste collection, treatment, and disposal through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 796 employers in Honolulu, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waste Water Treatment 22.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Snowbridge Inc 24.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Morristown 25.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water Reclamation (Sanitation) 18.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aloun Farm, Inc. 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Refuse Division - Honolulu Yard 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE AZCO INC. - Hu Honua Bioenergy 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4829-13976 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9095-HNL 5,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR HNL HONOLULUL 4,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawaiian Airlines - HNL 4,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12812007 MOANALUA MEDICAL OFFICES 2,355 FTE
NAT-TCR Jackrabbit Family Farms, LLC 23.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Full Circle Seattle Warehouse 23.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kersten Lumber Company, Inc 23.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RDU - Ground Ops 23.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SCCY 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheelabrator Portsmouth Inc. 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE 313 - Leesburg 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE 202 - Fargo 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.