Fractional horsepower electric motors manufacturing · Tennessee

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford)

Erwin, TN · ~116 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fractional horsepower electric motors manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford): 1.1 TCR = 32% of Fractional horsepower electric motors manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) safety composite

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2018

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) injury rate improved

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford)'s TCR fell 0.8 from 0.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335312 · Erwin, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/10
  • PHOTO Etheredge Electric C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Etheredge Electric Company LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) averages 1.1 TCR (32% of the Fractional horsepower electric motors manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) falls in its industry

222 Fractional horsepower electric establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 10 Fractional horsepower electric employers in Tennessee.

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) (116 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford)
Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) (116 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Regal Beloit America, Inc (Shallow Ford) has fewer employees than the Fractional horsepower electric motors ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2016 0.8 0.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335312 · TN · Erwin

222 Fractional horsepower electric motors manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 24 employers in Erwin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Etheredge Electric Company LLC 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Swiger Coil Systems, a Wabtec Company 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NEC Field Service 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ozark - 1910 Baldor Drive; Highway 64 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Process Systems Incorporated Construction Company 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE WEST TENN PAVING & GRADING 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Family Brands LLC 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Greetings - Ripley 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc. 722 FTE
CITY-NEAR TN-Tennessee, LLC. 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR TN Tennessee, LLC 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Erwin Health Care Center 135 FTE
NAT-TCR Art Sample Furniture 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR West County Energy Center 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., Henderson 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Tetra Dynamics 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Oilwell Varco Galena Park 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Canton Transfer , LLC 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Terex - Southaven 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1004-40 GoJet ORD Pilots 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.